Sample scan

This is what the free scan looks like.

Same structure you receive: the recorded journeys, the readiness assessment across four layers, and the three fixes that would move you most. Nothing here is blurred out.

This page shows the format. The subject is anonymized and the figures are representative of scans run to date rather than a single named client. Your scan will carry your own numbers, and a person signs it.

SANDRIA VISIBILITY SCAN / SAMPLE FORMAT

Subject: longevity clinic, physician-led, European city market

Engines: ChatGPT, Claude, Perplexity, Gemini. 24 queries. Prepared and signed by a person.

34/100 READINESS

1. The journeys

Twenty-four questions a prospective client actually asks, run through four engines, recorded end to end. Three are reproduced here.

Q1"best longevity clinic in [city] for a 45-year-old executive"

4 of 4 engines answered. Subject named by 0 of 4.

reason: services and protocols not machine-readable; no independent source describes what the clinic delivers

recommended instead: two clinics with parsed service lists and one international group

Q6"is [subject] a legitimate clinic"

4 of 4 answered. All four hedged.

physician credentials present on the site as images, not text; no engine could state who practices there

two engines recommended verifying with a national medical register instead

Q13"how much does a full longevity workup cost at [subject]"

4 of 4 answered. 3 of 4 quoted a figure.

every quoted figure came from third-party pages, and two were wrong

the clinic's own site was consulted by 1 of 4 and yielded no price

2. Readiness across four layers

TECHNICAL	24	No structured data for services, protocols, physicians or pricing. Credentials rendered as images. Booking flow loads client side, so crawlers see an empty container.
CONTENT	38	The site answers philosophy questions. Clients ask about legitimacy, cost, what the first visit involves, what the tests actually measure and who reads the results. None are answerable in text.
TRUST	44	Present in two industry directories, absent from every editorial and reference source the engines cited in this category. Nothing independent repeats the clinic's own claims.
ACTION	29	No machine-reachable consultation path. An agent that decided on this clinic could not complete anything, so it does not decide on this clinic.

3. The three fixes that would move you most

Make the services and the physicians readable. Structured data for protocols, tests, consultation types and credentials, served as text rather than images and rendered before a script runs. This is the single change that lets an engine state who practices at your clinic and what they do.
Answer the questions clients actually ask. Legitimacy, cost, what the first visit involves, what a biomarker panel measures, who interprets it. Plain text, on your own domain, in the words clients use rather than the words the category uses.
Get one independent source to agree with you. A single editorial placement that describes the clinic and its physicians moves the trust layer more than any change to your own site, because engines do not take your word for anything, and in health they take it less than anywhere else.

Signed: a person, not a scoring model. Every scan is read and signed before it ships.

Yours will be about your clinic.

Free, complete, delivered within 5 business days.

Run your free scan